Bo Jones. Or maybe Dennis. (
nookiepowered) wrote in
fandomhigh_ooc2012-03-27 01:38 pm
Entry tags:
Location Poll Results and FH Plans
Hail, Fellow Fandomites!
Time to catch up with the results of the location poll that closed at the end of Saturday night: the final tally was 21 to 12 in favor of remaining on Livejournal.*
While we know that's not exactly unanimous (and wish fervently that there were a solution on which we could all agree unanimously), it is the preference of the majority, which is what we feel it's best to work with for now. If things get seriously bad on LJ in the future, we'll definitely re-assess the situation.
We're going to be doing our best to keep the game up to date on official repairs and user workarounds to the problems we've all been experiencing, as well as anything less helpful that might be coming at us. We'll keep posting news and updates here, so watch for the livejournal tag (or stalk it, if you'd like a heads-up in your inbox).
We also know (boy howdy) that the status quo isn't ideal, and we absolutely understand if it's just not workable for you. However, we'd hate to lose any of our players, so if there's anything we can do to help make Livejournal bearable -- changes to community designs, setting up new OOC processes to avoid the problems, working up tutorials, or things we haven't thought of at all, please talk to us about it, either here in the suggestions thread, or at any time by e-mail!
__
* (And the average fear-level induced by Frank the weeping goat is 10 out of 10. I am only sorry that I had already created the poll before I thought to make the top of the range 11 while leaving the label "On a scale of 1 to 10...")
Time to catch up with the results of the location poll that closed at the end of Saturday night: the final tally was 21 to 12 in favor of remaining on Livejournal.*
While we know that's not exactly unanimous (and wish fervently that there were a solution on which we could all agree unanimously), it is the preference of the majority, which is what we feel it's best to work with for now. If things get seriously bad on LJ in the future, we'll definitely re-assess the situation.
We're going to be doing our best to keep the game up to date on official repairs and user workarounds to the problems we've all been experiencing, as well as anything less helpful that might be coming at us. We'll keep posting news and updates here, so watch for the livejournal tag (or stalk it, if you'd like a heads-up in your inbox).
We also know (boy howdy) that the status quo isn't ideal, and we absolutely understand if it's just not workable for you. However, we'd hate to lose any of our players, so if there's anything we can do to help make Livejournal bearable -- changes to community designs, setting up new OOC processes to avoid the problems, working up tutorials, or things we haven't thought of at all, please talk to us about it, either here in the suggestions thread, or at any time by e-mail!
__
* (And the average fear-level induced by Frank the weeping goat is 10 out of 10. I am only sorry that I had already created the poll before I thought to make the top of the range 11 while leaving the label "On a scale of 1 to 10...")

Questions
Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
I have half a tutorial written up for using off-site icons in comments -- which will help a lot of us who don't want to give LJ any more money but still want all the icons we can dream of -- but I'm stuck on finding a way to float images in LJ comments, since it disallows the style attribute.
So. Any suggestions for that, anyone? :D
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
(no subject)
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Ponies are cute and adorable (unless you have to clean up after them.) I like ponies a lot, but cats are more fun to snuggle with and tend to clean up after themselves. Granted they're not very useful as transportation unless you're in a certain Sylvester McCoy Doctor Who episode, but let's face it, this paragraph is mostly filler anyway.
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
You can use align=left inside the image tag, but LJ won't recognize the hspace=attribute, so you get the text snuggled right up against the right side of the image.
To get yourself some whitespace, do:
<table align=left><tr><td width=110><img src="[ICON URL]" width=100 height=100></td></tr></table>[YOUR TEXT HERE]
which gives the result
THEN USE <br clear=all> SO YOU DON'T GET STUPID WRAPPING BENEATH, SIGH.
I like the stupid wrapping without table
Re: I like the stupid wrapping without table
Re: I like the stupid wrapping without table
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
There's been a few journals where I've clicked in to read extended threads and for the life of me, I can't get the expand function to work. It's not a browser issue because it happens in both Firefox & Chrome.
Re: Suggestions
And no, that didn't make me giggle. What gave you that idea?
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
And with AU kids weekend coming up, it seems like people using journals they're not able to force everything to display in their own style with is going to be a lot bigger problem than it has been.
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
So... I don't know. I don't want to shut people out from tagging in a post I make, but neither do I want to revert my lj back to a style with issues that make me *loathe* tagging.
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
That said, the new comment pages still give me headaches/eyestrain (and as an animator, I kind of need those eyeballs), so I generally just turn on the custom comment pages to get a comment page version of what I see when I load my friendlist. It's kind of clunky, and LJ loves to push second and third threads off the page and devour them forever, but it doesn't cause me physical hurt.
But now I'm wondering if the expand function on the custom comment pages is broken, or if this is just another side-effect of LJ's new, default migraine-deluxe ones. Haaalp?
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
So, as far as I can tell, (and I can be completely wrong, because this whole thing has me tearing out my hair in frustration), our options are:
*LJ's new default, which lets us have long threads but no subject headers, coloration can be migraine triggers, and the new icon browser-thingy (that's the technical term for it, trufax).
*Custom comments, which break, jump backwards to the beginning of the post when comments get added, and lose long threads.
*Classic comments, which work like s1 used to(?), but have other pros/cons?
I admit, I haven't swapped back to classic, mostly because it seems like a lot of work to get my f-list to look like something I'm not happy with and I don't know if/how to make it do the things I want anyway. But I figured I'd ask the People Whut Know About This Stuff, so I can decide what to switch to and how to get it as close to functional for me and everyone else that I can.
So, I ask you--what kind of comments are you using? Pros? Cons? How does it compare to the other options? Are there more comment types than the ones I've listed? Sorry to make you go over old ground, but...Help?
Re: Suggestions
So I guess that's a con, on my end -- honestly, probably the biggest one I've noticed.
Re: Suggestions
The 4th option is what Jara's doing, which is using LJ's default, but with Stylish and Greasemonkey scripts that fix most of the negatives including subject headers, icon browser, etc. The drawback to that is that those are browser-dependent and have to be installed on every computer separately, so if you're reading from work or a library, (or, thanks Erin, your phone) etc., you're not going to have them.
I'm using Classic Comments and this workaround to read my own flist in my chosen style rather than the Minimalism it's technically set to, but that trick only works for paid accounts.
I have my fingers crossed that this particular trunk of the LJ Changelog means they're working on the break/jump backwards/lose long threads issues for custom and classic comments, since that's what "S2 comments pages" refers to. ("S1 comments pages" are what they call the default style, no matter how many changes they make to it.)
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
Re: Suggestions
General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
THE DREAM OF FH LARP HAS NOT ENDED.
Also, thank you guys for all of your hard work, especially over the past few months. It can't be easy, but you're doing great.
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
Re: General Discussion
As far as I can see it, our problem can be summed up like this: 1) Some people legitimately have issues commenting and threading. 2) This game is made up of commenting and threading, so people who cannot do this cannot participate in the game. 3) We need to figure out HOW to fix this problem for everyone, because it isn't fair to the people who can't comment, at least if we want them to continue to play in this game.
I think a standardized commenting system is the best way to do this, but I'm sure there are other possibilities out there. Suggestions? Ideas? Anything?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
OOC