http://valentine-tart.livejournal.com/ (
valentine-tart.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomhigh_ooc2005-10-19 05:50 pm
Entry tags:
OOC and IC: Friday Ethics Debate - Tara, Shep, Beka, Cameron, and Rory
For convenience, I'm creating this post for us to OOC and IC hash out the debate stuff.
I'll place a link to either the Ethics classroom or Study Hall or the Perk or something for the IC stuff once we get going, to provide an IC chrono context for the discussions.
Tara-mun, you're included, in case we have OOC questions, but more until we get the sitch with Shep's ankle and his replacement, if any, straightened out.
I'll be AFK for an hour or so. Otherwise, jump on in. And whomever gets assigned in Shep's place - jump on in. I'll change the subject line to include you as soon as I know who you are. :D
As a reminder, this is the assignment:
First speaker, Affirmative - defines the key words, outlines the arguments his or her team will be making, and begins to address them.
First speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts (disagrees with) the points 1A made, outlines their own team's arguments, begins to address them.
Second speaker, Affirmative - briefly rebuts 1O, gives the body of the team's argument.
Second speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts 2A, gives the body of the team's argument.
Third speaker, Affirmative - rebuts all the arguments of the Opposition, in detail. May add one new argument if appropriate.
Third speaker, Opposition - rebuts all the arguments of the Affirmative, in detail. May not add any new points.
I'll place a link to either the Ethics classroom or Study Hall or the Perk or something for the IC stuff once we get going, to provide an IC chrono context for the discussions.
Tara-mun, you're included, in case we have OOC questions, but more until we get the sitch with Shep's ankle and his replacement, if any, straightened out.
I'll be AFK for an hour or so. Otherwise, jump on in. And whomever gets assigned in Shep's place - jump on in. I'll change the subject line to include you as soon as I know who you are. :D
As a reminder, this is the assignment:
First speaker, Affirmative - defines the key words, outlines the arguments his or her team will be making, and begins to address them.
First speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts (disagrees with) the points 1A made, outlines their own team's arguments, begins to address them.
Second speaker, Affirmative - briefly rebuts 1O, gives the body of the team's argument.
Second speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts 2A, gives the body of the team's argument.
Third speaker, Affirmative - rebuts all the arguments of the Opposition, in detail. May add one new argument if appropriate.
Third speaker, Opposition - rebuts all the arguments of the Affirmative, in detail. May not add any new points.

OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
OOC - Shep's mun is going to be mostly AFK this weekend. She'll be contacting you about it too.
In sum, Cam-mun, Shep-mun, and I have talked and we're concerned NPCing Shep for the debate may not be the best way to handle it. I just threw this up here early so I could go eat.
I'm sure Shep-mun will fill you in IC and OOC.
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
While we're at it, do you have a definition of murder you want us to use or are we free to define at will?
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: OOC Hash out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
Re: OOC Hash Out
IC Hash Out
Beka tentatively approaches Cameron. "Hey. Sorry about the phone message. Bad night."
"Hey," Cameron smiles at Beka. "Sorry to hear. You okay?"
Beka smiles back wearily. "Me? Fine. Just don't ask about... my roommates, my new emodemon pal, the Student Council President, or any teachers who might regularly have sex." When she pauses for breath, she notices Cam seems cheerful. "You look happy."
"Oh ouch. I won't then." Cameron grimaces, but smiles again at her last remark. "That's because I am. Do you want to wait until Sheppard shows up or do you want to start already?"
"Thanks." She smiles, and it's clear she means it. "I'm glad. Let's just get started. He's been scarce since the jogging accident."
Cameron blinked. "Jogging accident? He said he was fine."
"Last I saw him, which was...yesterday, I think...no, the day before, his ankle looked like a tree trunk."
"Oh man, I knew we should have taken him to the clinic," Cameron sighs as he takes out a notepad.
"He's stubborn like that. Not your fault." Beka rolls her head on her shoulders and pulls out her Flexis, which holds the assignment, and a notepad. "How'd you want to start?"
"I'm not surprised." Cameron sighs and looks over his notes. "Divide rolls and make sure we have some clear arguments that we all agree upon. The rest will be improvisation depending on what the other team says."
"Right. Well, if we don't know what Shep's going to be capable of, let's give him the smallest role and the one that can be prepared most in advance. No?" She taps a pen against her lips. "Seems like the critical thing is controlling the terms of the debate. They're going to want 'murder' defined broadly. It helps our argument if we keep it narrow."
Cameron nods in agreement. "We definitely need to set apart the difference between murder and killing that happens in self defence or accidental to begin with. That leaves us with planned murder and passion crime and I don't think it's too hard to say those should never be allowed."
Beka considers this. "I think we should be even more narrow, if we can. Maybe we should require premeditation for it to be murder? Passion crimes are never 'right' but there are justifications in some legal systems. Mine, for example."
"There are justifications, but it's still wrong to have an impulse to kill. It's poor judgement if you let your anger get away like that." Cameron frowned. "I don't think you can simply wipe this sort of crime out of the definition because it's harder to defend."
"Maybe we should ask Ta-- Professor Maclay about the rules for that? I'm not sure what we can do. A juridical definition of murder is probably a good place to start. We can always rule stuff out later if she says it's OK." Beka chews her lip. "Which piece of this do you want to take?"
"I think we should just do what the instructions say. I'm sure she expects us to be able to handle this ourselves. I like your idea of starting with the juridical definition. Second or third speaker is fine by me."
Beka nods. "OK. If I had to guess the other side's line up, Angelus will want to go last. Parker will want to go ... first, probably, to attack our definitions. And Phoebe in the middle. I'm good either second or third. Maybe we'll get a natural sense of flow as we're working."
Cameron nods. "Sounds good to me."
Shep limps in very slowly. "Sorry I'm running late. I'm uh... not moving so well. Where are we?"
Cameron frowns as he sees Shep limping. "Yo. You alright? I thought you said it was fine."
"Hey, you. You got worse. You should...get that taken care of." Beka looks concerned.
Re: IC Hash Out
murder : the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
Do we want a more tightly sealed definition or one that leaves more room for the other team to debate?"
Re: IC Hash Out
"And..." Here she winced painfully thinking of her recent stint in detention. "Do we want to go with a definition that basically says it's only murder if you get caught? Might be good to decide what incidents we think are murder and adjust the definition?"
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
"Say we go with this definition, for now. Why is murder wrong?"
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
She shrugs. "I'm OK with that definition or one like it. I think it's broad, but it'll make for a good debate
which we're so going to lose because OMG it's Thursday afternoon!. I think we should ask them to stipulate that state-sponsored assassination is not the same thing as murder."Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
Re: IC Hash Out
no subject
Tara comes in and slumps into one of the chairs.
"I've sent an email offering extra credit to anyone who leaps in at the last minute. If no-one volunteers - which is entirely possible - you have two choices. You can go into the debate with just two speakers, or one of you can speak twice. Third speaker doesn't really prepare an argument, they just rebut everything the other team has said, so a first speaker/third speaker double up would be acceptable."
She shrugs apologetically. "Things like this happen in group work. I can only promise the two of you won't be penalised for it, regardless of the outcome of the debate itself."
no subject
no subject
no subject
Beka jerked her chin up, sort of a nod and a bit of 'it's OK if you say no'. "We still on for breakfast tomorrow?"
no subject
She stands, brushing her skirts into neat folds. "Give me a call if you have any questions. And Rory? Thank you so much for stepping in at the last minute."
no subject