http://valentine-tart.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] valentine-tart.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh_ooc2005-10-19 05:50 pm
Entry tags:

OOC and IC: Friday Ethics Debate - Tara, Shep, Beka, Cameron, and Rory

For convenience, I'm creating this post for us to OOC and IC hash out the debate stuff.

I'll place a link to either the Ethics classroom or Study Hall or the Perk or something for the IC stuff once we get going, to provide an IC chrono context for the discussions.

Tara-mun, you're included, in case we have OOC questions, but more until we get the sitch with Shep's ankle and his replacement, if any, straightened out.

I'll be AFK for an hour or so. Otherwise, jump on in. And whomever gets assigned in Shep's place - jump on in. I'll change the subject line to include you as soon as I know who you are. :D

As a reminder, this is the assignment:

First speaker, Affirmative - defines the key words, outlines the arguments his or her team will be making, and begins to address them.
First speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts (disagrees with) the points 1A made, outlines their own team's arguments, begins to address them.
Second speaker, Affirmative - briefly rebuts 1O, gives the body of the team's argument.
Second speaker, Opposition - briefly rebuts 2A, gives the body of the team's argument.
Third speaker, Affirmative - rebuts all the arguments of the Opposition, in detail. May add one new argument if appropriate.
Third speaker, Opposition - rebuts all the arguments of the Affirmative, in detail. May not add any new points.

Re: OOC Hash out

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, what's happening with Shep's ankle? Do we actually need a replacement?

Re: OOC Hash out

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Okay. I'll go back over the class discussion and pick someone else out to 'volunteer', pending Shep-mun's decision.

Re: OOC Hash out

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Two options: if Shep goes first speaker affirmative, the speech can be entirely written beforehand, and Shep-mun doesn't actually need to be there. Second option: I beg another student to take up the position (and there's really nothing around here that doesn't sound smutty, is there?) at the last moment.

Re: OOC Hash out

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
You define it however you want - it's your debate. The only rule about definitions is that you can't define the other team out of the debate. You have to give them something to argue, so no truisms.

Re: IC Hash Out

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 10:42 am (UTC)(link)
"Okay, I looked up the definition in just an ordinary dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=murder) and even that is already enough to back us up:

murder : the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought

Do we want a more tightly sealed definition or one that leaves more room for the other team to debate?"

Re: IC Hash Out

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
"I don't know why you think it's only when you get caught. Unlawful applies whether you get caught or not. I thin specifying a law is a bad idea as it gives you a lot of cultures where it doesn't apply to. Leaving it exactly like this you specify that you respect every culture's law."

Re: IC Hash Out

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
"No, crime is a general action that you do that is wrong. It doesn't matter if you get caught or not." He frowns. "Taking another life is taboo in pretty much every culture. It's even considered a sin."

Re: IC Hash Out

[identity profile] cameronmitchell.livejournal.com 2005-10-20 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
"In which case neither actions are actually against the law," Cameron rebutted. "Necessity of survival falls under self defence, no?"

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-21 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
"Hi Beka, Cameron - I just got your voicemail."

Tara comes in and slumps into one of the chairs.

"I've sent an email offering extra credit to anyone who leaps in at the last minute. If no-one volunteers - which is entirely possible - you have two choices. You can go into the debate with just two speakers, or one of you can speak twice. Third speaker doesn't really prepare an argument, they just rebut everything the other team has said, so a first speaker/third speaker double up would be acceptable."

She shrugs apologetically. "Things like this happen in group work. I can only promise the two of you won't be penalised for it, regardless of the outcome of the debate itself."

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-21 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
"I know you can. I have every faith in the both of you. Would you like me to stick around for a while, or should I leave you to it?"

[identity profile] brambless.livejournal.com 2005-10-21 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Tara grins. "I wouldn't miss it."

She stands, brushing her skirts into neat folds. "Give me a call if you have any questions. And Rory? Thank you so much for stepping in at the last minute."